It is always refreshing to get a visit from a product of the USA's efficient system of brainwashing: the joint venture of the public schools and our Leftist controlled media. They have done such a good job in your case that you don't even think it happened.

1. You are only 18 years old, but you think you have all the answers. And since the other adolescents you hang out with agree with you, you figure your answers are beyond question. When you are 10 years older you will realize how little you knew when you were 18 and I guarantee that you will no longer care whether or not 18-year-old kids agree with your point of view. Why? Because at 18 your brain has only barely reached a nearly mature state, and still has development to go through before it is fully mature. Your life's experiences have been phony, in that they have been controlled and free from the responsibilities you will have to take on as an adult. You go to school, play sports and think that is real life. It give you an egocentric view of the world. All that matters to you is yourself and your wants. Once you have lived on your own and been responsible for taking care of yourself for a few years, and done something productive with your life, you will then realize how little you really understand about the world at 18.

2. You don't tell us what you think of your mother directly, but from your comments you must not think much of her, and how she spent her life. That should tell you something about the influences you have been exposed to. You cast off your mother's role in your life, as being insignificant and something that is not at all worthy of emulation. Either you view her as a very bad mother, or you have been taught to think of all homemakers as useless, and not to be copied in your own life. If it is the latter, you are being quite dishonest in your claim that that you have not been exposed to propaganda that has influenced your thinking on this matter. If it is the former, you have my sympathy.

3. You admit that men are stronger than women, but you are not thinking clearly when you ask, "So what?" Men are stronger physically, and are mentally driven to compete, and to win far more than women. It is the reason that men have dominated all societies that have ever existed, and why they always will. If men all at once decided to make all women slaves, there is nothing that women could do about it. From this simple fact, it follows that it is in all women's best interest to make sure that each generation of boys growing up is taught to respect women and to treat them with honor, never hitting them. It is critical that women have a role in society that gives them status and that utilizes their natural abilities. At the same time it is critical that men have their natural abilities and tendencies directed towards positive activities. Men can best have their natures fulfilled through working to support a family. They will direct their aggression towards competing in the workplace, and they will have their need to lead, supplied by heading up a family. They will be taught from birth by their mothers, that women are not the same as men and must be treated differently. Women, who are naturally more nurturing, best have their natures and abilities served by being the great wives and mothers that they are capable of being. They will manage the house, monitor the children and be the single most important influence in their children's young lives.

4. I saw an article in a magazine a while back where an 85 year old lady ran marathons, running the entire 26 miles. Since you don't run the whole 26 miles, does that mean that she is more powerful than you are? While many women can run, have you noticed that the winner of all mixed marathons is always EASILY a man? Although I am much older than you are, I would be happy to take you out on a racquetball court and show you how it is done, or on a basketball court, in a boxing ring, or in a karate match. I would have no doubt about how it would turn out if I were locked into a room with you, if only one of us could come out of it alive. That is what I am talking about when I speak of men being stronger than women. What makes life good for women, is having men that will let life be good for women. Feminism creates men who don't care about women. Feminism creates an animosity between the sexes that is removing the framework from our society, a society that had made life better for women than it had ever been for the entire history of mankind. More women are being beaten and raped today than ever before in American history, and that is only going to get worse because of feminism and other Leftist causes.

5. It was nice of you to admit the possibility that my page is completely accurate in its assertion that most women can be good homemakers. I never said that ALL women can be good homemakers, any more than I said all men can be good husbands. If you can't do the job, then fine don't do it. If you noticed, nowhere on the page do I suggest that the government should force all women to be homemakers. What I want is for the government to get out of the picture altogether on the issue of working women, and let the society decide for itself what it wants!

6. I am sure that in your mind I am a problem. I do not bend with the times, or go with the latest fad. I do not accept the propaganda that is put out by the media and the controlled school system. Instead I think for myself and that is always a problem for those who are following the crowd. So, if you define "the problem" as something that sticks in your craw and makes you uncomfortable because your belief system is shaken, then I am "the problem" and proud to be so. If, on the other hand, you define "the problem" as the destruction of our families, and therefore our society, then I am certainly not "the problem." Those who thought like me were responsible for creating this society in the first place! They are the ones who made life so easy that it was actually possible for people like you to assume that you have no responsibilities to anyone but yourself. Instead of thanking them for what they did, and trying to emulate what they did, so the next generation can have the same great way of life that you have had, you call them "the problem" and are perfectly happy to destroy this society in order to pursue your own selfish interests. That would sound like you, along with the feminists who brainwashed you, are the real problem, doesn't it?

There is still hope for you. Perhaps one day you will grow and realize how important your mother really was in your life. It is just possible that you will see that there are other things than yourself to be concerned with in life, and you may one day find yourself being a good wife and mother. Stranger things have happened. I at least have that hope for you.

This question has an easy answer: Just look that the way things were before, when America was already turned to "my way of thinking." It is my familiarity with the America of the 1950s that makes me so completely certain of what I am saying.

In the 1950s, we had a crime rate that was well below the crime rate of today. There were no school shootings, and the divorce rate was very low compared with today. The average child grew up in a household where both of his real, biological parents, resided. Illegal drugs were nearly unheard of for children. Even legal drugs (alcohol and tobacco) were far less abused by children. Women and children were safe on the street after dark, and the American schools were the best in the world. I am sure that even you can see the difference between that wonderful situation, when compared with the mess we are in today.

1. There were female homosexuals then just like now. Homosexuality was frowned on by the society and therefore those who decided that they just had to practice it, did it covertly. Since that effects less than 4% of the population it is clear to any clear thinking individual that the whole homosexual subject is merely a side issue that should not concern the mainstream of our population. Take for example, Raymond Burr, the actor that played Perry Mason in the television show of the 1950s. He was a homosexual but kept it to himself and nobody was put out about it. He did not lose his job and he was not abused, he just kept his lifestyle to himself.
   
   
2. As for women who did not have an interest in being married, they existed too. However, their numbers were much smaller then because our society was much saner, and promoted the natural roles for men and women. Girls were taught in school that they were going to become homemakers and they looked forward to being like their mothers, who were for the most part good housewives. When girls are not brainwashed with the lesbian propaganda, and boys are taught to accept their natural role in life, most of the boys and girls grow up to become men and women who will form long lasting marriages, with the men providing "the bacon" and the women caring for the home and children.
   
   Once again, we are talking about a very small and insignificant percentage of the female population that will be dead set against marriage. For those, like in the 1950s they can go out and get work. There were "old maid" women who were college professors, and scientists and many other things. Their numbers were small and for the most part, they were of no real import as far as the society was concerned but that option was always there.
   
   
3. Single moms existed in the 1950s too. They had homes set up for unwed mothers. It was considered to be something for which a girl should be very embarrassed over and I think that was a very good thing! You should be embarrassed for creating a bastard child, that you will not be able to support, and that you will no doubt have to take charity for to raise. You should be embarrassed for creating a child that will be raised without a father, which is a cruel deprivation. You should be embarrassed for having sex with someone you are not married to, and have no intention of marrying. When society promoted a wholesome attitude about sex, expecting kids to wait until marriage before having sex, the result was that far more kids did wait until marriage before having sex. And of the ones who didn't, most of them got married to their partner, either before or after a pregnancy made them face the consequences of their actions. The "uptight" attitudes of the 1950s is what created the atmosphere that made marriage a lot more certain of working than the loose and stupid attitudes of today.
   
   As for the women who were single mom, life was hard, like it is today. That is why the lifestyle should be avoided by making wise choices.
   
   
4. The 1950s also had divorcees and widows. Widows were usually cared for by their church and their families. Most people feel great sympathy for a widow. If she is young enough she would normally remarry. That happened to a couple of my Mom's sisters in the 1950s. Others had to tighten their belts and find a job. Their children suffered greatly if that happened and just like today, if the children were left alone, they often turned to crime and got into other mischief. Fortunately, in most cases, there were other family members to help out and take some of the load off from the widow. (It is certainly no better today!)
   
   Divorce in the 1950s was quite different than today. First of all there were very few of them. The vast majority of children lived at home with both of their real parents. So, while today, over 80% of the children are without one of their parents at home, the reverse was true in the 1950s.
   
   Think about it. Would you prefer to drive on a road system that was really safe, and prevented the vast majority of accidents, or one on which 80% of the drivers had accidents but was arguably a little better at taking care of injured drivers? Our society is crushing our children with out divorce rate.
   
   In the 1950s the courts wanted to know who broke up the marriage, because the offending party would be forced to make great concessions to the offended party. If a man cheated on his wife or left her, he would be stuck with big child support payments and lose a big portion of the joint property to his wife. If the wife was cheating on her husband, she could lose custody to the kids and most of her claim to property. Divorce was far less common. There was pain attached to breaking up your marriage, as their should be!
   
   
5. There was domestic abuse in the 1950s, but far less of it than today, because most men were taught that beating up a woman was a unacceptable thing to do. Today boys grow up being told that girls can do anything that boys can do. "Anything" includes being able to defend yourself. Women cannot defend themselves (along with a host of other things) as well as men can. But feminism promotes the lie that they can. To hit a defenseless woman is a disgusting thing to do. Most men of the 1950s believed that. But there is no such thing as a defenseless woman to the man who has been through the feminist brainwashing mill. Hey, women can be policemen, and soldiers. That means women are required to put up their dukes and fight like a man.
   
   The feminist points of dogma, have repercussions. When you say that women are equal to men, that means they have no special rights, or considerations. They are exactly the same as men, and can expect no favors or special treatment. Men who actually believe that nonsense are far more likely to beat up a woman than those who, like myself, feel that woman are not equal with men, but are special, wonderful creatures that deserved to be treated completely differently than men are.

The 1950s were not perfect. They had many of the same problems that we have today. People are imperfect, and any society that is built by humans will be imperfect. If we were wise, we would weigh the two societies, the one of the 1950s, and the one of the 2000s, against each other. If we did that we would find that the 1950s were head and shoulders above what we have now. Forty years of dropping academic achievement, has had a drastic impact upon our society. Forty years of an increasing divorce rate, leaving over 80% of children half orphaned, also has had a drastic impact upon our society. But in order to satisfy the whims and desires of the small number of lesbians, and other ill adjusted women, we have sacrificed more than 4 out of 5 children to the god of feminism, and we have created schools that have no connection whatsoever to excellence. That is what we should be focused on, not the small and insignificant number of lesbians who are unhappy with their lot in life among normal people.

No system is going to cover all circumstances equally well. What a society has to do is to cover the largest majority very well and try to be as easy on the rest as possible. The feminist dominated system today is doing the exact opposite! Our system is very easy on the small minority, while destroying the majority. That is a very destructive way to run a country. What we are doing to our children is criminal. What we are doing to the families of this nation is unforgivable. Feminism is pulling this country down and it is pretty shallow, and even dishonest, reasoning trying to justify feminism by using as supportive arguments the evils of lesbianism, women who refuse to marry, divorce, widowhood, single motherhood, and domestic abuse. With the one possible exception of widows, every one of those categories has been enlarged by feminism. (Even lesbianism is being promoted today as "safe sex" by some feminists!) This reasoning is like shooting both of your parents and crying to the jury, begging for mercy because you are an orphan. Feminism made these social ills, not only worse, but much worse.

The feminists are working hard to produce this attitude in men. They continually beat the drum of equality, as if it were a fact. They force men and women to pretend like women can do anything a man can do. Then with these ridiculous ground rules in place, we are then all forced to deal with the real world, where biology and reality do not care what feminists say, or what the Supreme Court rules.

Women are not morons, they are just different than men, with different talents than men have. Their brains are physically different than men's brains. In business they are at an extreme disadvantage, and I recently saw a feminist on television say that she felt that women would never fill half of the real leadership positions in business because they were not driven towards that role.

I don't get the flower thing either, but I don't care. The smile that a flower puts on my wife's face makes it worthwhile for no other reason. Watching the joy it brings to women warms my heart, just like my wife is warmed by the joy I get from my love of electronics and science, which she has no love for at all. I am so happy that my wife cares for our home, because I live in a tidy, warm and homey place that I could never have created on my own. Together, men and women build things greater than either could build separately. At least they do when feminism gets out of the way and lets them.

Women are nurturing. I remember when I was teaching electronics in the Navy, one of the very few female sailors we had coming through the class, set to cleaning up the instructors' desks and doing general housekeeping duties that she was never assigned. No male sailor ever had the thought cross his mind to do such a thing. But it was a nice thing to do, and women often are like that. That is why they are so great with kids. They tolerate behavior that Dad would punish for, and they care about the little things a child brings to them to share, in a way that only a mother can. Men are inferior to women in this area.

In the areas that you mentioned, women on average are inferior to men, and they always have been. They always will be. But why is that even a concern? Because feminism made it a concern. Feminism is striving to drive a square peg into a round hole, and they are using the government as a hammer to do it with. All of the crazy and destructive side effects from this process are the chips flying from the once healthy society we once had. If the peg and hole are the same shape the fit is smooth and creates few problems. When they differ, the problems are many. So, it was before feminism, where the roles of men and women fit their own capabilities. The divorce rate was very low, and most kids were raised by both of their real parents. Ladies and gentlemen grew old with their families intact. As they grew old, their children and grandchildren were around them and honored them. Today the reverse is true. And families are coming apart as fast they the come together.

Anyone who remembers his childhood, and what his mother meant to him, would never call her a "moron." She was different than Dad, and if you are honest about it, you were happy for the difference. Women have their own kind of genius, and all civilizations have benefited from it. They do not make the best rulers, or the best businessmen, but they make homes the best that they can be. They raise the next generation to be strong and healthy, rather than warped and twisted. For certain areas of life we stand on the shoulders of all the men who have come before us and did their part to make it a better world for their children. But in other areas of our society we are just as indebted to the soft and caring shoulders of the women who came before us.

The point is that women are different from men and should be treated differently than men are. They should have different roles in society and they should be honored for the things they do better than we do, instead of having them forced into doing that which they are inferior at. The real villains in this play, are the feminists who are driving this process along.

Some folks are waking up, and I can testify to that from the email I receive. You would think with a web page like I have, I would be buried with hate mail. But most of my mail is supportive. There are a lot of folks who are sick and tired of the oppressive government, and that my unhappy friend is where revolutions are born. You won't find these people in the Democratic party, or even the Republican party. (Both of these organizations are anti-male and anti-traditional America.) The conservatives are working hard to "conserve" the destructive changes brought upon us by the Left in the 1960s. The ones who are waking up are working outside of those corrupt systems.

You may be right in your pessimism. America may be dead, and finished. If things do not change, America will be a third world country in just a few more decades. But I have more respect than that for the American people who built this country, and I have hope that they will once again ignite the passionate hatred of tyranny that created this great country in the first place. I hope to see them throw down the tyrants and reestablish the Manifest Destiny that drove Americans to raise a great nation upon this land. The race is on and we will see whether the Leftist enemies of America can destroy her completely before the people arise to protect themselves. Join with me in attempting to inspire the people to do what needs to be done! What do you have to lose, besides a yoke around your neck?

Nice try, but that analogy just won't wash. How many "Husband" magazines are out there on the magazine shelves? Now check out the "Bride" magazines. Notice the difference? Women dream of marrying a good man and having a family. They fantasize about it, with their magazines, and their romantic novels. How many people who later became slaves do you know who fantasized about it, or free men who dreamed of how wonderful it would be to be a slave?

Chivalry, is a code of ethics by which a man gives up to the weaker sex, many of the things he could easily demand or take, because of his natural physical dominance (granted by biology), as a form of civilized and gracious behavior. If Chivalry were truly slavery there never would have been a woman's movement because it would have been easily crushed by the male "masters." Women would never have a prayer of physically challenging men if men seriously opposed them.

The traditional roles of men and women came from biology. The natural tendencies of both of the sexes are best served by those roles.

On the other side of the coin, men and women both have selfish tendencies which are curbed by focusing upon creating a strong family. Men naturally tend towards promiscuity, and violence. The family reigns them in and redirects their competitive and aggressive natures towards constructive and productive endeavors in the work place in order to support their families. Instead of being a drain on society, married men are instrumental in shaping the framework of our society. Women naturally tend to focus upon clothes and beauty items, and shopping for trinkets. A single woman is usually frittering her life away. But put her in a family, and her talents are put to excellent use. She runs the home and guides the children. If she has a good husband who properly supports her, and their children, she will be a major force in shaping the next generation.

Sure, taking your responsibility seriously is a big crimp on your free time. For 99.9% of the people, showing up for work is not something they want to do, it is something they have to do, if they want to eat. We are all slaves to our stomachs. We must eat or we die. If we want to live in a crime free society, we must teach our children to be law abiding, and it has repeatedly been demonstrated that this is best done by a mother at home, backed up by a father who lives in the same house as his biological offspring.

Biology is what demands this, and so if we are slaves, it is to our very nature. Whining about it is really rather useless. Instead, what smart people will do, is to make lemonade rather than crying about all the lemons they have been handed. Women are not men, and men are not women. Women logically will take on the responsibilities that they are best suited for, and men will take on those that they are best suited for. If the Federal Government had stayed out of the way and let things go on naturally, you would have seen how incapable women are of actually competing with men in most occupations. (And therefore would have stopped trying. Just like they stopped trying to qualify for men's professional sports.) Feminism is a sham held up by oppression by the state.

For example, if we had not lowered the physical standards in the occupations that very much need them (i.e. policeman, fireman, soldier, etc.) we would have nearly zero women in those professions. Lowering standards does not improve the quality of the employee who has to meet them. Therefore, it is not that women have suddenly became capable of being policemen or soldiers, but it is that policemen and soldiers have become less useful and capable of performing their jobs. Those who promote women into jobs through government coercion are not interested in protecting our society from criminals, or protecting our country from aggression. They are only interested in their own selfish agenda and nothing else. Instead of being happy with whom they are, they look at men with jealousy, and hate the fact that they themselves are women

There is nothing more disgusting about the feminist movement to me than the absurd, and condescending arrogance that feminists ooze from every pour as they insist that the American citizens do not have the right to hire whomever they choose, for whatever reason they choose, and that the Federal Government is obligated to force the feminist agenda down America's collective throat. They have no reason, or biological support for their contention that the sexes are exactly the same except for the plumbing. There is a tremendous amount of scientific evidence to show that they are wrong. But they still expect everyone to play the fool for their sham.

Well, sorry but those days are over. There are more and more folks who are finally standing up and admitting that the Emperor has no clothes. And it is about time too!

Shelly,

You must mean some other web site. I think women are humans too. I think that they deserve to not only be treated as humans, but as the very special creatures that they are. Women are not slaves, and while they certainly are sexual beings they are much more than that. Women are sometimes rational and sometimes not, and in some areas they are as intelligent as men, while in other areas they are not.

A point of disagreement is that women do need men to take care of them. A woman who is not protected by men in one way or another will be living in constant danger. The men of the police and the military give her protection today and so feminists like you think that is enough. Many women are finding that is not the case. As our society continues to deteriorate, more and more women will realize that men who are their protectors are to be valued greatly when compared with the male predators who will make up the bulk of any society where feminism rules. When men start viewing women as being able to take care of themselves, men no longer give women the special consideration that is needed for women to get along in a society where men are present. In the long run, a woman will be either a special creature, treasured and respected, or a sexual object to be used. Men have a natural biological urge to gravitate towards the latter, but civilization teaches them to accept the former. Feminism is destroying that civilizing instruction and creating men who no longer wish to be good husbands and protectors for their women. You and other feminists will one day realize that you have been used as pawns in the power struggle going on in America and many other nations of the world. These power brokers don't care about women and they never have. They use women as disposable tokens, and once used for their purpose, they cast them on the heap of what they consider unimportant females, who have broken homes, undisciplined children, and a husband who left years ago.

Welcome to the wonderful world of feminism, where equal opportunity means that women can work fewer hours and accomplish less, but still complain that they are not making as much money. If you call them on it, you are a sexist pig!

-Al-

I am not familiar with the case you are referring to but when you say, "Congratulations, Sport !" to someone killing a kid, it sounds like you are in support of the action. I am glad to hear that you are not.

Of course I know why you are angry, it is the same reason that I made my web page in the first place. In my essay, Why Boys Don't Count I discuss many of the things that the quote you inserted here is mentioning. When I started this page up, I was sick of listening to the wacked out feminists spewing their disgusting garbage out through the media, and through the government and the schools completely unopposed. Nowhere was there a voice that was taking a hard-line against the basic ideas of feminism. Even this guy you quoted had to make sure that he was politically correct, and lead in with the obligatory feminist obeisance with the statement, " I say this as someone who believes wholeheartedly in equality of opportunity for men and women." Even when you can find someone who says something against feminism, they bend over backwards to appear feminist at heart. That is what the media has done to my country, and yours is no better my Brit friend. Why? Because the same group of people own the media in both countries and don't you doubt it for a minute.

We definitely have our work cut out for us.

Guy ,

Killing baby girls is the one of the most disgusting things that I can think of. If you are so beaten down that you can celebrate that you are already licked. And I do not want anyone to get cancer, even the feminists. If it comes down to war to recover our freedom then so be it but let's not get wallowed down in hate. Healthy anger that moves you to appropriate action is great, destructive hatred will only bring you down. War is the place for bloodshed, and it may come to that, but until it does, we need to find positive things to do to fight these Leftist oppressors.

America is already on the road to destruction. We are displacing the people of America, dismantling our culture and institutions that created this country and replacing them will Marxist egalitarianism. Before the Leftist invasion in the 1960s (about the same time the Beatles did) America was not about equality. America was about freedom and opportunity. Enforced equality destroys both freedom and opportunity, and therefore, Marxist egalitarianism is destroying America. It may not be “buring in Hell” as you put it, but will soon be wallowing in poverty like the Soviet Union collapsed into.

The goal of the Marxist is to sow discontent, and disruption. They wish to cut people lose from their heritage and culture. Marx taught that such people are malleable and easily controlled. That is why the Leftist feminists are pushing for such ridiculous laws to be put in place. Have you noticed that the numbers of women required in the definition of proper “representation” for females in any job is the one provided by those on the extreme Left, and the laws are always based upon their point of view? Instead of focusing upon America and upon women for your hate, you need to study who it is that is driving the Leftists in their cause. Who provides the media support for them, without which they would never have gotten anywhere. Who finances their movement? There is where your anger should be directed.

I have often wondered when the threshold will be crossed. As America is being dismantled, when will the pain of watching your people and your land being destroyed overwhelm the fear of losing your current state of comfort? That is the real issue. At what point will the people be willing to sacrifice their “bread and circuses” in order to regain their freedom?

No, PC language would say, "You must take every opportunity your government hands to you, but you do nothing on your own.

The problem certainly is Demographics, but it is not merely the graying of America. It is a problem brought about on purpose by those on the Left. They have "convinced" (through the oppressive tactics of our government) Americans not have children, and to dismantle their world class school system in order to create the educational nightmare which exists today.

I, like you, hope to see American men rise up and take this country back from the Leftist egalitarians and return us to the land of my forefathers. Things look bleak at the moment, but there is always hope.

Ah yes, a case of full blown feminism is in evidence here. Note the anger and hatred expressed openly. Note the advanced symptoms of repeated name calling. Dementia Feministia has set in and fully blocked reality to her mind as she dreams of power, where none exists. It is very sad to see when the condition goes this far.

It is a "woman's world," in this subject's mind, in countries where nearly all of the power positions are held by men, as they have been in all societies that have ever existed. If she were joking it would be a humorous idea to advance, but since she is serious, we must admit that we are observing the clear indication of the complete distortion of perception by her condition. And to fairly wallow in joy at the idea of women dying is the sign of a very strange and abnormal shift in ethical perception and loyalty quotient, for she is ecstatic at the idea of those of her own group who are being killed. The number of females who have died in battle as "soldiers" are so insignificantly small as to be hardly worthy of mention, if it were not so absurd that any women were ever placed in that position.

Note also the joy expressed at that which is completely the reverse of reality. She is delighted at men being scared, and small. Of course if men were actually frightened by feminism, they would do with feminism what they have always done with anything that they have been frightened by. How many wolves do you see in any major city? Lions, tigers, alligators, or poisonous snakes? When man finds something to be truly threatening, he wipes it out. Since feminism still exists, it is obvious that man has not yet been truly threatened by it. It is most fortunate for this particular subject, in her hallucinatory state. All sane people admit that women are on average, smaller than men. To be delighted in the smallness of men is like being delighted by the brightness of night or the darkness of day. She is a very sad case indeed.

The normal female brain is very advanced in vocabulary manipulation, which allows its owner to be quite adept at choosing the correct words to express her ideas. In the case of advanced feminism, however, it nearly always causes a crippling of that portion of the brain which controls word selection, and they invariably fail to find clear expression in normal speech. Study this "lady's" post and note the repeated need to fall back upon the weakened language skills coping technique of using obscene and vulgar terminology to fill in for the unknown correct terminology, or to create unnecessary emphasis. Most pathetic.

Lauren, thank you for the kind wishes. Of course no two people are created equal. That is a common myth that has been abused beyond belief. We are all created unequal, thank goodness. We are different and therefore have different abilities and talents. We have different desires and goals. Different things make us happy. That is why having the government forcing us to treat each person as if he were some machined part, coming off an assembly line, and interchangeable with all other parts, is ridiculous, counter-productive and even dangerous.

Men and women for thousands of years have put their differing talents to good use so that society could benefit. Though almost no one actually reaches their "highest potential," I would say that probably the largest number of the people who have, were mothers who were homemakers. If you read the biographies of most great men, they have become who they were to a great extent because of what their mothers taught them in their youth. I do not know of any other role, occupation or station in human existence that has been held in such high regard as that of mother. To insult a man's mother is worse than to insult the man himself, and will lead to aggressive retaliatory action quicker.

I am certainly glad you enjoyed your visit to my site. Come back anytime.

I am sorry. :-) I am writing for a couple of other web sites, and my wife's web site and so I have not done much with this web site in a while, except for this guest book. Since you asked so nicely I will try to get another one up this month sometime.

Sam, as I have pointed out in my articles on the web page, feminists hate traditional women more than they hate men. The reason of course is that in order for feminism to succeed in its goal, men and women must be identical and interchangeable in all ways. The homemaker is a nurturing and caring person that is more interested in her family than moving up some corporate ladder. She is different than man, and that is not acceptable to feminists. Therefore, they have attacked the homemaker continuously, calling her names and describing her in the most demeaning fashion. From feminists we have been told that homemakers are stupid, uneducated, slaves, donkeys, and without ambition, drive or merit.

When the movies, schools and government also continually promote this completely false stereotype, it is no wonder that women are ashamed of being "only a housewife." They feel like they need to do something more to properly impress the other women who are avoiding their own responsibilities to their families. It is a little bit like a law-abiding, honest man apologizing to a con man because he doesn't rip people off.

A mother who is a homemaker works as hard or harder than anybody. She does a great work, and an important work, and our society is feeling her loss greatly today. A homemakers should hold her head up high and proudly say, "I am a wife and a mother, who is nurturing my family and raising the next generation to be strong, honest, educated, and well-mannered." It is only the most important job on earth. Feminists realizing this, understand that they must make this critical job look bad in order to justify their destructive cause in the eyes of most women.

The feminist mind shows its true nature to anyone who wants to see it, as it continually takes the wholesome, productive, critical role of homemaker and holds it up to ridicule and hate. A woman who is to proudly be a homemaker today must be a very strong minded individual, to look past the propaganda and see the real value of what she is doing. A man too must be able to move past the lies and rhetoric that he has been exposed to, in order to properly appreciate the role his wife is fulfilling in making a home for their entire family. He must shoulder the difficult burden of supporting his family, so that his wife can be free to raise their children. All the while they must stand up under the constant barrage of hate and anger from the feminists and their disciples in our society, many of whom you have seen dropping off a sample of their mindless hate in this guest book. Traditional life is not for the faint of heart in the current feminist saturated environment we live in, but it is the most important thing a couple starting out today can do!

Paul, have you ever noticed how the Leftists try very hard to belittle IQ test results? The fact is that there is no other test that can be given to as correctly predict job performance (even one that is specifically designed to test job related skills!) than an intelligence test. The Leftist controlled courts have banned the use of an IQ test as part of the job interview process, despite this fact. They claim that the tests are culturally biased or otherwise flawed, but when push comes to shove, IQ matters. Then, they love to use the word "stupid", which really means having a low IQ, as if low IQ is a reasonable concept but high IQ is not. Excuse the digression, but this is yet another area in which common sense is blatantly attacked by the Leftists.

You have put your finger right on the button. Common sense is so sadly lacking in every Leftist cause, that it is only by distracting people away from using it, that they can continue to survive. That is the root cause of why they are such great name callers, and dispensers of ridicule. There is no possibility of calm and rational thought, founded upon common sense, when the whole discussion is about emotionally charged labels and whether or not they apply. This juggling act they are attempting cannot be continued indefinitely, and when it falters, we will see the whole thing fall down around them.

Thanks for your intelligent, and insightful post!

-Al-

Phoebe,

It is nice you have something to believe in, no matter how misguided it may be. This page has been far from a waste of time. Over 26,000 people have visited it and that means it is of interest to a great many folks. Of course it is not the most visited web page on the Internet, or even the most visited of my web pages but it has certainly been worth the time that I have invested in it.

It is rather silly of you to suggest that feminism has nothing to do with men. Men are affected at least as much as women are by the feminist movement. As children they are no longer raised by their mothers but by strangers employed to simulate mothers. As students they are condemned for being what they are, and as adults they are discriminated against for who they are. Their children will be deprived of a mother’s care as they grow up. They will almost certainly have their marriage end in divorce. They will be far more likely to see their children turn to drugs or crime because of the side effects of feminism. At work they will be forced to deal with people who are too sensitive for jokes or other normal male behavior, and they must pretend that they believe other than they really do in order to be promoted or even remain employed. All of these things are things which specifically effect men, and are therefore very much a man’s concern.

What you women want may depend upon you but what you get depends upon men and their malleability to your desires, as has been the case for the entire history of mankind. Women are physically too weak to force men to do their bidding so they must rely on their femininity to coerce men to accede to their desires. This has traditionally been through the role of husband and wife interaction. Feminism has tried to upset that apple cart by getting the government to be their “husband” and have him force their will upon others. As long as men are content to sit still for oppression, your feminist desires will be forced down all our throats. However, oppression has a way of breeding revolt, and there is this little matter of a backlash that will not be pleasant for anyone when it happens.

The third world is moving into the USA at a rate of well over a million a year, and so we will not long have to send money to other countries in order to help third world countries, we will soon be one. But that is another issue. And what do you think I am doing by fighting feminism on my web page? If our families are to survive, we must focus on keeping them together and that means to oppose feminism. If our kids continue to raise themselves then we will continue to see outrageous and illegal conduct in them. That effects everyone , men and women. In order to save kids from drugs we must eliminate feminism, and start having children supervised by their mothers again. This is something that mankind has known all along. The way you shape the young mind effects the way the teenager and even the adult will act. Turning that job over to someone else or ignoring it altogether as feminism is promoting, is a formula for disaster.

Thanks for stopping by, and it is never a waste of time to provide me with an opportunity to show how damaging, oppressive, and pure “rubbish” feminism really is.

To those who want to continue to simply, and unthinkingly, promote the feminist dogma I am sure my page would appear to be a "waste of space." Of course to anyone who likes to use their brains, and think for themselves, they will find a discussion of these issues to be interesting and useful, no matter which side of the discussion they are on.

I suppose that you consider it "intelligent" to be rude and uncivilized in your comments.

Besides being the most wonderful woman that I have ever met, my wife is also one of the most intelligent. My wife's IQ is above that of the average doctor, and yet, in your complete ignorance you try and label her as "stupid."

And of course you try and label me as "stupid" as well. I have already dealt with that ridiculous accusation before in my guestbook (it is about all you feminists can come up with). I find that the only effective weapon that feminists (and Leftists in general) have, aside from the totalitarian actions of the government, is name calling. You call people who disagree with you "sexist," "stupid," "inbred" and/or "Neanderthal," as if passing out those ridiculous labels were somehow an argument in favor of your cause. To those who are perceptive enough to identify these tactics for what they are, it only weakens your case, which was already extremely anemic.

Alie,

Your post was quite entertaining. It is a clear indication of the current state of effectiveness of the feminist propaganda effort. You are right in the mold with other feminists, where you can do little more than call names. You called me dumb twice, stupid once, old once, and also suggested that I was beat and rejected as a child. You have been programmed well. No thought, just vitriol. If you can't argue, call names. You are a perfect feminist clone. The leftist attempt to destroy the influence of those who are older and wiser, who would carry on the culture, the heritage and the wisdom of previous generations, has been exceptionally effective with you as well.

Of course I am not dumb. As I have stated on several other occasions in this guest book (You might try reading a few of the entries. It would be educational for you.) I am in possession of a great deal of external evidence to the contrary, so that accusation is nothing but noise, which destroys your credibility. Just because you disagree with someone does not make him dumb, nor does it make him stupid. You make no points for your position by throwing mud, at least not in this guest book.

The fact that you are in a very small minority, being a child who lives with both of her real parents, is interesting but that is all. Since feminism hit our country, the percentage of children who are raised by both their biological parents has fallen below 20%. That means for every one like you, there are at least 5 who do not live with both of their biological parents. So, your case is an exception. I am glad for you that it is the case but it says nothing about feminism. Before feminism hit, the vast majority of kids lived with both their real parents.

Bill Clinton also goes to church. So what? Have you studied the Mafia at all? Many of their members are Catholics who go to church each week. Stating you go to church means little or nothing as far as this discussion goes. There are a great many feminists who are trying to break down the many Christian churches because they know that those churches are their mortal enemies. They are quite active in their churches! The same is true of other faiths as well, although the progression of destruction has not yet been as effective there.

If you had taken the time to read my page, or even this guest book, you would realize why your question about why not Mr. Mom, is silly. Men are different than woman are. If you would have read the article on my web page called THE BOTTOM LINE you would realize that the female temperament is strikingly different than the male temperament. Women can do a far better job with children than men. They have demonstrated that for thousands of years, which you would know if you had actually studied history, rather than that feminist drivel they have fed you in school. In the book Brain Sex which I reference in THE BOTTOM LINE there is a great deal of scientific evidence that female brains and male brains are physically different, and that is why they function differently.

In my article about abortion, the only point that I made was that two children who are equally developed, one inside the womb and one outside the womb, are equally valuable and equally worthy of the right to live. That does not take a Ph.D. in biology to understand. Even a 16 year old should be able to understand it.

But let us take it a little farther still. Here are a few facts that you may or may not know. The tenor of your post leads me to doubt that you do:

• When an abortion occurs, which is always after 6 weeks, (almost no woman even knows for sure that she is pregnant until she is at least 6 weeks along) the child has a heart that is beating, and his brain is producing measurable brainwaves. When they are deciding whether or not an adult human is still alive these are two of the most important items that they check. When an abortion is done, it stops a beating heart and